V.P. Stus, A.M. Fridberg, E.O. Svetlichny, D.I. Ljulka, A.Y. Myroshnychenko

Diapevtics in management of staghorn nephrolithiasis and multifocal, hemostasis problem

The paper reflects 40 years experience and analysis of therapeutic effect in one of the severe forms of urolithiasis as staghorn and multifocal nephrolithiasis. The paper reflects the historical ways of solving problems and the development of ways to help. To date, the analysis showed the priority of innovative methods. From our point of view it is an axiom and non-negotiable. The main negative factor of percutaneous intervention is a question of possible bleeding and hemostasis. From our point of view, innovative methods should not lead to conversion. The paper reflects hemostatic methods during percutaneous interventions, at the present stage. This work has shown that the development of innovative treatments requires endurance and patience of surgeons for the introduction of modern methods of treatment, which is the popularization of minimally invasive urology. It is referred to the various modern techniques of minimally invasive urology for hemostasis, wich don’t lead to conversion.